Maryland case law › Allen v. County Commissioners

Allen v. County Commissioners

74 Md. 294 (1891) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: AffirmedFowler✓ Good law
HoldingEdward M.

Fowler, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. ■ The appellant Edward M. Allen, as trustee of his wife, is the owner of a farm in Harford County, which is assessed for taxation on the assessment books of that county 295 at eight thousand three hundred and twenty dollars. This farm is encumbered with mortgage liens amounting to sixteen thousand two hundred and’ fifty dollars. At the proper time the appellant applied to the County Commissioners to have the whole of said assessment abated, because of said mortgage liens, but his application was refused. In default of the payment of the State and county taxes for 1887 and 1889, said farm or a portion of it was about to be sold to enforce the payment of said taxes, whereupon the appellant applied to the Circuit Court for an injunction.

His application was refused and hence this appeal. The only question raised here or intended to be raised, is whether real estate which is mortgaged should be assessed and taxed at its actual assessed value without regard to the mortgage liens, or whether the amount of such liens should be first deducted from the assessed value in order to ascertain the taxable value. The appellant contends he is entitled to the deduction mentioned, and he bases his contention upon the fifteenth Article of the Bill of Eights of the Constitution of Maryland, which provides, among other things, that “every person in the State, or person holding property therein, ought to contribute his proportion of jrublic taxes for the support of the Government, according to his actual worth in real or personal property. ” If this were a new question, its importance would demand a full consideration and discussion; but it has been definitely settled by our predecessors in the cases known as “The Tax Oases under the Act of 1841”. reported in 12 G. &J., 117, in which,'without delivering an opinion, the rulings of the lower Court, refusing the deductions and abatements now claimed, were affirmed. One of these appeals was that of the lateo George M. Gill.

It appeared from the record in his case that he had been

This is a preview of Allen v. County Commissioners. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.