Maryland case law › Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Hardy

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Hardy

487 Md. 456 (2024) · Supreme Court of Maryland

Supreme Court of MarylandDisposition: OtherMatthew J. Fader✓ Good law

HoldingThis matter came before the Supreme Court of Maryland as a joint petition to suspend Respondent James Roger Hardy, II from the practice of law for 120 days, nunc pro tunc to October 25, 2022.

* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION OF MARYLAND SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG Docket No. 4 JAMES ROGER HARDY, II * September Term, 2024 CORRECTED ORDER Upon consideration of the joint petition to suspend the respondent from the practice of law for 120 days, nunc pro tunc to October 25, 2022, it is this 25th day of July 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, ORDERED that the Respondent is suspended for 120 days, nunc pro tunc to October 25, 2022, and it is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 19-751, the respondent is reinstated to the Bar of Maryland nunc pro tunc to February 23, 2023. /s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. 2024.07.29 15:21:49 -04'00' Gregory Hilton, Clerk The correction notice(s) for this opinion(s) can be found here: https://mdcourts.gov/sites/default/files/import/appellate/correctionnotices/coa/4a24agcn.pdf