Maryland case law › Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Weinberg

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Weinberg

486 Md. App. 386 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Court of Special Appeals of MarylandDisposition: ModifiedMatthew J. Fader✓ Good law
SummaryAsher N. Weinberg was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. He filed a first motion to modify his suspension, which was denied. He then filed a second motion to modify his suspension. The Supreme Court of Maryland, in a brief order, granted the second motion in part. The Court stayed Weinberg's suspension in favor of six months' probation, subject to the condition that he comply with the Maryland Attorneys' Rules of Professional Conduct. The order was issued pursuant to Rules 19-740(c)(2)(B) and 19-741(h), and the probation period runs from the date of the order. The order does not contain any reasoning, analysis, or discussion of legal questions. It is a per curiam order with a majority of the Court concurring.
📖 Open the full case in RecordCite — full opinion, AI chat, highlights & citator →

* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * COMMISSION SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG Docket No.1 ASHER NEWTON WEINBERG * September Term, 2022 * ORDER After he was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law, Asher N. Weinberg filed his first motion to modify his suspension. That motion was denied. Mr. Weinberg then filed a second motion to modify his suspension. Upon consideration of Mr. Weinberg’s second motion to modify his suspension, it is this 21st day of February 2024, by the Supreme Court of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, ORDERED that the second motion for modification of suspension is granted in part; and it is further ORDERED that, pursuant to Rules 19-740(c)(2)(B) and 19-741(h), and accounting from the date of this Order, Mr. Weinberg’s suspension from the practice of law is stayed in favor of six months’ probation subject to the condition that he comply with the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct. /s/ Matthew J. Fader Chief Justice Pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. 2024.02.21 16:28:43 '00'05- Gregory Hilton, Clerk