Maryland case law › Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cannon

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Cannon

329 Md. 306 (1993) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: Other✓ Good law
HoldingThis matter came before the Court of Appeals of Maryland on a Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission.

ORDER Upon consideration of the Petition for Reprimand by Consent filed herein, it is this 9th day of February, 1993, ORDERED, that the Respondent, Winifred E. Cannon, be, and she is hereby reprimanded for her violation of Rule 1.4(a) of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, and it is further, ORDERED, that the Respondent’s practice be monitored for a period of one (1) year by a member of the Maryland Bar, acceptable to Bar Counsel, while Respondent remains in private practice as a sole practitioner, and it is further ORDERED, that said monitor shall provide Bar Counsel with written reports on a quarterly basis, and it is further ORDERED, that should Respondent cease solo practice she shall have the right to petition this Court for a modification of the necessity of the monitor.