Maryland case law › Attorney Grievance Commission v. Crowther

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Crowther

295 Md. 23 (1982) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: Other✓ Good law
HoldingThe Attorney Grievance Commission, through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary Action against Lester H.

Per Curiam: The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary Action, pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9, against Lester H. Crowther, alleging violations of the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility. The matter was referred to Judge John R. Hargrove of the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City to make findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Maryland Rule BV10. After an evidentiary hearing, Judge Hargrove made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. "FINDINGS OF FACT "1.

In August, 1976, Sonia M. Mules, the complainant, and Pauline C. Kengerski retained the Respondent to administer the estate of their brother, Bernard F. Owens, who had died on August 6, 1976, and to advise them on all other matters in connection with the estate, including any taxes that might be due by the estate or any beneficiaries. "2. The Respondent was advised that the assets of the estate were nominal, but that there was substantial jointly owned property consisting of 28 savings accounts totaling more than $148,000.00 and two pieces of real estate known as 2912 and 2914 St. Paul Street, Baltimore, Maryland. "3.

Mrs. Mules and Mrs. Kengerski were appointed as personal representatives of the estate of Bernard F. Owens. "4. The real property known as 2914 St. Paul Street was sold by the remaindermen on June 21, 1977, with the net proceeds of $48,913.55 being paid by check to 'Lester H. Crowther, attorney.’ Respondent retained said proceeds 25 until April, 1979 when he distributed the prorated portion to each of the remaindermen. "5.

The real property known as 2912 St. Paul Street, which was deeded by the remaindermen to the widow of the decedent, Sonia Owens, was sold by her on June 21, 1977. The net proceeds in the amount of $43,960.26 was paid by check to 'Lester H. Crowther, attorney’ and deposited in an account at the Equitable Trust Bank, account number 001-103-144-4 in the name of the Respondent as attorney for Sonia Owens. Over a period of several years, the Respondent distributed a portion of the funds to the widow. "6.

From the proceeds of the sale of 2912 St. Paul Street and after payments to Mrs. Owens, the following amounts were left in an escrow account created by the Respondent to pay: Inheritance Tax $4,500.00 Federal Estate Tax 8,460.00 Reserve for Additional Tax Liability 4,500.00 Total $17,460.00 These monies were under the exclusive control of the Respondent as of June 21,1977 for the purposes listed. There incurred an outstanding tax liability of $17,680.00 unsatisfied on the estate which was not paid by the Respondent and was subsequently paid by Mrs. Sonia Mules with funds of her own on December 29, 1979. This amount was subsequently made good by the Respondent at the time of the settlement of the claim. By May 19,1980, funds in the escrow account had been completely exhausted.

Prior to that date subsequent contributions had been made by the heirs to satisfy the tax liability of the estate because they had been left unattended and unpaid by the Respondent. "Mr. Crowther’s only account of the whereabouts of these funds is that they were withdrawn for his personal use pursuant to an oral loan arrangement between himself and Sonia Owens. Mrs. Owens, at the hearing, denied the exis 26 tence of such an agreement explaining that the money was not hers to lend and was to be used solely for the purpose of paying the expenses of the estate. By Respondent’s own admission at his hearing, the $17,400.00 plus the accrued interest was used for his personal use.

During this period (1977-1979), Mrs. Sonia Owens and others made numerous demands of Respondent to turn over records and funds pertaining to the estate of Bernard F. Owens. The Respondent never complied with these requests. Because of the difficulty in dealing with the Respondent’s stalling tactics, Mr. Crowther was discharged as attorney for the Owens estate by all parties on September 15, 1979. "Respondent refused all requests by new counsel, Dorothy Beaman, to turn over all records and monies of the Owens estate still under his control.

The decedent’s heirs were required to initiate civil action in the Superior Court of Baltimore City against the Respondent, and others in whose office he appeared to be associated, to recover their losses. A settlement was reached, where the Respondent finally turned over most of his records and paid his former clients a sum of $28,636.39 on December 15, 1980 in satisfaction of all claims. "At the time of that settlement, the escrow account under Respondent’s control had a zero balance. If properly maintained, the account should have held $17,460.00 plus

This is a preview of Attorney Grievance Commission v. Crowther. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.