Maryland case law › Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ruhl

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ruhl

453 Md. 354 (2017) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: Other✓ Good law
HoldingThis matter came before the Court of Appeals of Maryland on a Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension By Consent filed pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736.

ORDER Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension By Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736, proposing such discipline as corresponding discipline for a suspension imposed by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in the matter of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jesse Raymond Ruhl, No. 1313 Disciplinary Docket No. 3, it is this 19th day of June, 2017, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Jesse Raymond Ruhl, Respondent, is hereby indefinitely suspended by consent from the practice of law in this State, effective immediately; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Jesse Raymond Ruhl from the register of attorneys in this Court, notify Respondent of such action, and comply with the notice provisions set forth in Maryland Rule 19—761(b); and it is further ORDERED, as a condition precedent to reinstatement, that Respondent must be reinstated as a member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania before seeking reinstatement to the Bar of this Court.