Attorney Grievance Commission v. Wyatt
37 MURPHY, Chief Judge. Edward Gross Wyatt, a member of the Bar for almost thirty years, was found by Judge Dana M. Levitz of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County to have violated DR 1-102(A)(5) and DR 6-101(A)(3) of the Code of Professional Responsibility for neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him between 1982 and 1986. 1 The disciplinary charges grew out of Wyatt’s employment by John Miskelly in a worker’s compensation case. The record discloses, and Judge Levitz found, that Wyatt entered his appearance before the Commission as Miskelly’s attorney on April 20, 1982; that he postponed a hearing before the Commission scheduled for April 21 to prepare the case; that thereafter, although frequently prodded by Miskelly and the employer’s insurer, Wyatt “did virtually nothing in regard to this case from April 1982 until an Issues Form was filed by [Wyatt] with the ... Commission on or about December, 24, 1986”; that Wyatt was discharged by Miskelly in 1989; and thereafter Wyatt arranged a hearing in the case.
Judge Levitz found that because of Wyatt’s neglect, Miskelly’s medical bills were never paid. He found that various reasons given by Wyatt for not requesting a hearing were not credible. He found as a fact that while Wyatt had serious medical problems, they were not the cause of Wyatt’s neglect of the Miskelly case. Bar Counsel recommended a sixty-day suspension for Wyatt’s misconduct.
He pointed out that Wyatt’s neglect was complete and total; that the medical bills remain un 38 paid; and that while no actual monetary loss may have been sustained by Miskelly, nevertheless as a result of Wyatt’s neglect, it warranted a suspension. While readily acknowledging his misconduct,
This is a preview of Attorney Grievance Commission v. Wyatt. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.