Maryland case law › Attorney Grievance v. Hardnett
Attorney Grievance v. Hardnett
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: Other✓ Good law
HoldingThis matter came before the Court of Appeals of Maryland on a Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the respondent, Charlene Sukari Hardnett, by her attorney.
44 A.3d 424 (2012) 426 Md. 433 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Charlene Sukari HARDNETT, Respondent. Misc. Docket AG No. 64, Sept. Term, 2011. Court of Appeals of Maryland.
May 9, 2012. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition for Reprimand by Consent submitted by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, and Charlene Sukari Hardnett, Respondent, by her attorney, Melvin G. Bergman, Esquire. The Court, having considered the Petition, it is this 9th day of May, 2012, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Charlene Sukari Hardnett, be, and she hereby is, reprimanded for her violation of Rule 5.3 of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct.