Maryland case law › Attorney Grievance v. Resnick

Attorney Grievance v. Resnick

472 Md. 406 (2021) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: OtherRobert N. McDonald✓ Good law
HoldingThis matter came before the Court of Appeals of Maryland on a Joint Petition filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission and the Respondent, Perry Andrew Resnick, seeking to place Resnick on Inactive Status by Consent pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736(c).

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS v. * OF MARYLAND * Misc. Docket AG No. 76 PERRY ANDREW RESNICK * September Term, 2020 ORDER Upon consideration of the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Perry Andrew Resnick, to place the Respondent on Inactive Status by Consent pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736(c), it is this 9th day of March, 2021 ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Perry Andrew Resnick, is hereby placed on Inactive Status for an indefinite period of time, and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Perry Andrew Resnick from the register of attorneys in this Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761. /s/ Robert N. McDonald Senior Judge Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. 2021-03-09 14:15-05:00 Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk