Attorney Grievance v. Singh

* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * SUPREME COURT COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * OF MARYLAND v. * Misc. AG Docket No.17 September Term, 2021 RAJ SANJEET SINGH * Case No. 486684V * Circuit Court for Montgomery County ORDER Upon consideration of Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, Petitioner, on February 16, 2023, and the Response to Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action filed by Raj Sanjeet Singh, Respondent, on February 17, 2023, WHEREAS, in Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, Petitioner requests that the Court enter an order dismissing the Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action and directing each party to bear its own costs, WHEREAS, in the Response to Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action, Respondent requests that the Court dismiss the Petition with prejudice, and that Petitioner be ordered to reimburse Respondent for costs and reasonable attorney’s fees Respondent incurred in this action, WHEREAS, on January 30, 2023, the hearing judge filed with the Supreme Court of Maryland an Opinion and Order, in which the hearing judge concluded that Respondent violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 1.15(a), 1.16(a), 5.4(d), 5.5(b), 7.2, 8.1(b), and 8.4(a), (c), and (d), and Maryland Rules 19-407 and 19-742, WHEREAS, in the Opinion and Order, the hearing judge concluded that Respondent did not violate Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 5.4(a), 5.5(a),