Maryland case law › Baltimore Humane Impartial Society & Aged Women's & Aged Men's Homes v. Pierce

Baltimore Humane Impartial Society & Aged Women's & Aged Men's Homes v. Pierce

99 Md. 352 (1904) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: AffirmedBriscoe✓ Good law
HoldingThe Baltimore Humane Impartial Society & Aged Women's & Aged Men's Homes, a charitable corporation operating an Aged Men's Home, admitted Elisha Pierce, then about seventy, as an inmate in 1893.

Briscoe, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. ' The appellant is . a body corporate, duly incorporated for a charitable purpose, having for its object' the care of aged women and men, who are without the means to provide for themselves a comfortable home. 353 It appears from the record that on the sixth day of April, 1893, the appellee, Elisha Pierce, a resident of Baltimore City and about seventy years of age, was admitted as an inmate of this institution, under the following admission contract, which according to the rules o’f the institution had to be signed by, and also in behalf of the applicant, by two responsible persons, as sureties. Contract. “We, the undersigned, at the instance and request of Elisha Pierce, who is about to be admitted into the Aged Men’s Home, of the above named corporation, hereby covenant that he shall at all times yield due submission to the discipline, rules, and regulations of the said corporation, of said Ipme, or its superintendent and should said applicant, in the judgment of the board of managers thereof, fail to do so, they being the sole and exclusive judges thereof, <?r should he be afflicted with ungovernable insanity, we will at once remove said applicant from said institution and release the institution from his supports to which said applicant testifies his assent, by writing herein, and likewise so covenants. Done in consideration of such admission this sixth day of April, 1893.- Elisha Pierce. Seal.

Party applying in George W. Pierce. Seal, behalf of applicant. H. M. Brewer. Seal.

It also appears that another requisite for admission to the institution was, that the applicant and two responsible persons, as sureties, should sign a contract and covenant to the following effect: “We, the undersigned, do hereby covenant and declare that Elisha Pierce about to be admitted into the Aged Men’s Home of the above-named corporation hath not now any property and is not the recipient of any income from any source whatever, and do also covenant that should he by any devise, legacy or otherwise, become the owner of any property whatever, we will have the same, with any now owned, conveyed and transferred to the said corporation, in obedience to this covenant, and by this instrument he grants to the corporation, above named, all his right and title to any and all property of which he is now seized and possessed or to which he hath any right or title. This done in consideration of such admission and the applicant hereby constitutes the Treasurer thereof, 354 for the time being,, at his death, executor of this instrument, which js to- operate as a last will and devises to said . institution his entire estate real and personal, by these presents, of whatsoever kind and wheresoever situate, as witness our hands and seals this 6th day of April, 1893. Party applying hereby seals as applicant, covenantor and testator, in behalf of applicant as sureties George W. Pierce. Seal, and witnesses to this instrument H. M. Brewer.

Seal, by him declared .to be his last will Seal, and witnessed by us at his request as such in his presence and in the presence of each other. The appellee was admitted into the institution, under the foregoing contract, notwithstanding it appears he failed to sign the last-named contract and remained there for ten years. On the 4th of November, 1903, his son, George W. Pierce, ■one of the sureties on the contract died intestate and Elisha Pierce being entitled to his estate, amounting to about $4,000, the appellant filed the bill of complaint in this case. The prayer of the bill is, that “a decree be passed, declaring that all property which under the laws of Maryland would be payable by the administrator of George W. Pierce to Elisha Pierce, is the property of the appellant, as assignee of Elisha Pierce, and as creditor of George W. Pierce, and that the administrator be restrained from handing over the estate or any part thereof to Elisha Pierce,

This is a preview of Baltimore Humane Impartial Society & Aged Women's & Aged Men's Homes v. Pierce. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.