Maryland case law › Cabrera v. Penate
Cabrera v. Penate
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: Affirmed✓ Good law
SummaryThis matter came before the Court of Appeals of Maryland on an appeal from the Circuit Court for Prince George's County. The Court issued a per curiam order on May 1, 2014, affirming the judgment of the circuit court, with costs to be paid by the appellant, Claudia Natalie Cabrera. The order states that reasons would be stated in an opinion later to be filed. The opinion itself is not included in the provided text; only the per curiam order and the case caption are present. Consequently, the Court's reasoning, the legal questions presented, the material facts, and any analysis are absent from the text. The only disposition is the affirmance of the circuit court's judgment.
📖 Open the full case in RecordCite — full opinion, AI chat, highlights & citator →IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND No.110 September Term, 2013 CLAUDIA NATALIE CABRERA v. CECELIA R. PENATE, et al. Barbera, C.J. Harrell Battaglia Greene Adkins McDonald Watts, JJ. PER CURIAM ORDER Filed: May 1, 2014 CLAUDIA NATALIE CABRERA * IN THE * COURT OF APPEALS v. * OF MARYLAND * No. 110 CECELIA R. PENATE, et al. * September Term, 2013 PER CURIAM ORDER For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 1ST day of May, 2014, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County be, and it is hereby, affirmed. Costs to be paid by the Appellant. Mandate to issue forthwith. /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge