Maryland case law › Carroll v. Warden

Carroll v. Warden

222 Md. 618 (1993) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: Denied✓ Good law
HoldingCarroll filed a petition for post conviction relief under the Maryland Post Conviction Procedure Act, challenging his conviction primarily on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to convict.

222 Md. 618 (1960) 159 A.2d 851 CARROLL v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY [P.C. No. 93, September Term, 1959.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided April 18, 1960. Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND and HORNEY, JJ. PER CURIAM: The petitioner's contentions deal mainly with the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to convict, which is not a ground for post conviction relief.

Banks v. Warden, 221 Md. 592 , 155 A.2d 697 . Although he complains that he was not given a transcript of the testimony of his original trial, there is no allegation that he either requested such a transcript or that he sought an appeal and was prevented from perfecting it as a result of being denied the transcript, or otherwise. His application to the lower court shows no grounds for relief under 619 the Post Conviction Procedure Act, and his application for leave to appeal is denied. Application denied.