Maryland case law › Christman v. Warden

Christman v. Warden

219 Md. 693 (1959) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of Maryland✓ Good law

PER Curiam. The State concedes that, assuming the application to have been filed in time, the case must be remanded because of the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel for the defendant as a'n indigent person. Byrd v. Warden, 219 Md. 681 , 147 A. 2d 701; Sutton v. Warden, 219 Md. 687 , 149 A. 2d 375 . We think the application was timely.

Application for leave to appeal granted and case remanded "for further proceedings.