Commissioner of Motor Vehicles v. Steudl
Sybert, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. On February 23, 1960 the appellee, Hartman C. Steudl, filed suit in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County against Wil 544 liam J. Johnson, alleging that he had suffered personal injuries which were caused by the negligence of Johnson in the operation of a motor vehicle. On November 20, 1961 a verdict was entered for the defendant Johnson pursuant to Code (1957), Art. 66½, Sec. 168, 1 on the basis that the appellee’s injuries were caused by a motor vehicle, the identity, owner, and operator of which had not been established'. On December 21, 1961, pursuant to Art. 66½, Sec. 167, 2 the lower court passed an order which purported to authorize suit against the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, the appellant here.
On March 16, 1962 the appellee filed suit against the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, as authorized by the order. Subsequently, on September 18, 1962 the appellant filed a motion to vacate the order of December 21, 1961, which had authorized suit against the Commissioner, and a motion to strike the declaration filed on March 16, 1962. After a full hearing, the lower court granted both motions, but, in addition, granted leave to the appellee to file an amended declaration against the Commissioner within 15 days. The appellant then took the present appeal, contending that the lower court was in error when it granted leave 545 to file an amended declaration, since the order authorizing suit against the Commissioner, as required by Sec. 167, had been stricken and no subsequent order authorizing such a suit had been entered.
In the present appeal we do not reach the question whether the lower court was in error in granting the leave to amend under the circumstances of this case. The order appealed from was an interlocutory order, and not a final one, and hence the present appeal is premature and must be dismissed. As we said in Jeffers v. State, 203 Md. 227, 229 , 100 A. 2d 10 (1953): “It is a firmly established rule that an
This is a preview of Commissioner of Motor Vehicles v. Steudl. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.