Cook v. Pryor
Per Curiam. Mrs. Cook, the appellant here and plaintiff below, was injured on 9 August 1964 in an accident which occurred in the 42 State of Delaware, while a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by Pryor. When Mrs. Cook sued Pryor for damages, Pryor notified her, as required by Maryland Code (1957) Art. 35, § 50, of his intention to rely on the provisions of the Delaware “guest statute”, Del. Code Ann. tit. 21, § 6101 (a) : “No person transported by the owner or operator of a motor vehicle * * * as his guest without payment for such transportation shall have a cause of action for damages against such owner or operator for injury, death or loss, in case of accident, unless such accident was intentional on the part of such owner or operator, or was caused by his wilful or wanton disregard óf the rights of others.” It is well settled that Maryland applies the lex loci delicti to cases like the one before us.
White v. King, 250 Md. 192 , 242 A. 2d 494 (1968); 244 Md. 348 , 223 A. 2d 763 (1966); Harford Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bruchey, 248 Md. 669 , 238 A. 2d 115 (1968). In her pre-trial deposition, Mrs. Cook testified that she and Pryor were members of the Highway Christian Church of Christ in Baltimore; that on 9 August 1964 a group of parishioners traveled by automobile from Baltimore to Laurel, Delaware to attend a church service; that she was a passenger in Pryor’s car; that there had been no agreement with respect to the sharing of the expenses of operating Pryor’s automobile, and that she had made no contribution toward such expenses.
There was testimony, however, that Mrs. Cook had lent Pryor $6.00 to pay the cost of some repairs which had been made to Pryor’s car during the trip to Laurel and that the loan had been repaid some time subsequent to the accident. Although Mrs. Cook’s amended declaration alleged that the
This is a preview of Cook v. Pryor. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.