Maryland case law › District of Columbia v. Mensh

District of Columbia v. Mensh

99 Md. App. 362 (1994) · Maryland Court of Special Appeals
Maryland Court of Special AppealsDisposition: ReversedBishop✓ Good law
HoldingThe District of Columbia filed claims against the Estate of Julius Ginsburg in the Orphan's Court for Montgomery County, seeking approximately $260,000 in delinquent water and sewer service charges for seven properties allegedly owned by the decedent.

BISHOP, Judge. Appellant, District of Columbia (“District”), filed claims against the Estate of Julius Ginsburg seeking payment of delinquent municipal water and sewer service charges, total-ling approximately $260,000. Appellees, the personal representatives of Julius Ginsburg (“decedent”) denied the claims, and the District filed a petition for allowance of claims in the Orphan’s Court for Montgomery County. The court disallowed the claims and the District noted a timely appeal to this Court.

Issue The issue, succinctly stated by the District, is whether, under District of Columbia law, owners of multi-unit apartment buildings may be held personally liable for unpaid water and sewer service charges to their properties. 364 Facts The District filed claims against decedent’s estate seeking payment for overdue water and sewer service charges assessed against seven properties located in the District and allegedly owned by decedent. Appellees denied the claims, arguing that (1) the properties were not assets of the estate and (2) under the statutory law of the District, delinquent water and sewer service charges are not personal debts of the record owner of the property. Following the petition hearing, the court recognized the factual dispute between the parties concerning the ownership of the properties in question, but limited the scope of its inquiry to two threshold issues: (i) whether the District of Columbia’s Claims with respect to 450—51st Street, S.E. and 3425 Croffut Place, S.E. are time barred pursuant to Section 8-103 of the Estates and Trusts Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland, and (ii) whether an owner of real property situated in the District of Columbia is personally liable for water and sewer charges assessed with respect to water and sewer services furnished to such property. The court found, and the District conceded, that the claims referenced under the first threshold issue were time-barred.

The court also noted in footnote two of its order that “[u]pon review of the record it appears ... that the Claim with respect to 5037-5045 Call Place, S.E., Washington, D.C. was also filed after expiration of the statutory filing period;” however, because of the court’s disposition of the second threshold question, it did “not rule upon the timeliness of the claim with respect to 5037-5045 Call Place, S.E.” With respect to the second threshold issue, which is the subject of this appeal, the court found, pursuant to the District’s statutory framework, that the claimed water and sewer service charges were not the personal liability of the decedent and may not be asserted against his Estate: On the basis of the memoranda and arguments presented, the Court concludes that § 43-1526 authorizes the Mayor to provide for the collection of water rates from the owners of 365 the buildings, but does not by its terms impose personal liability. Moreover, the three methods specified in the statute for collection of unpaid water and sewer charges do not include personal liability of the property owner. Discussion The District’s statutory scheme governing collection of water and sewer service charges provides several methods by which the District may compel payment of delinquent water and sewer service bills from owners or occupants of “any building, establishment, or other place furnished water or water service by the District.” D.C.Code Ann. § 43-1528 (1990). According to appellees, however, these methods for collecting overdue water and sewer service charges are limited to the three specific remedies set forth in §§ 43-1527, -1528, and -1529.

These sections provide in pertinent part: § 43-1527. Additional charge on unpaid water bills. (a) An additional charge of 10 per centum shall be added to any water charge remaining unpaid after the expiration of 30 days from the date of rendition of a bill for such charge. * * * * £ * § 43-1528. Discontinuance of water service for failure to pay water charges.

(a) The Mayor of the District of Columbia is authorized to provide for the collection of water charges, in advance or otherwise, from the owner or occupant of any building, establishment, or other place furnished water or water service by the District, and to shut off the water supply to any such building, establishment, or other place upon failure of the owner or occupant thereof to pay such water charges within 30 days from the date of rendition of the bill therefor.... § 43-1529. Lien for water charges. (a) Except as provided in subsections (c) and

This is a preview of District of Columbia v. Mensh. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.