Gladney v. State
Per Curiam. The appellant was found guilty by a general verdict of possession and control of a narcotic drug by the court in the Crim 133 inal Court of Baltimore and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of S years. 1 On this appeal from the judgments he contends only that his arrest was illegal and therefore capsules containing a narcotic drug, offered by the State, were improperly admitted against him. There was evidence produced by the State that on 12 June 1967 about 3:30 P.M. Detective Louis Patti of the Baltimore City Police Department, assigned to the Narcotic Unit of the Criminal Investigation Department, accompanied by Detective Howard Zakitis in an unmarked police car, observed a 1964 green Cadillac convertible automobile parked at an angle at a parking meter. A man Patti knew to be Carroll Pulaski was standing by the left door of the automobile having a conversation with the appellant, who was seated in the automobile behind the steering wheel.
A man identified as Thomas Patterson was seated on the. right side of the appellant. Pulaski took a wallet out of his pocket and handed the appellant United States currency. The appellant handed Pulaski “a small piece of tinfoil, what appeared to be tinfoil to us at the time.” The officers stopped their vehicle directly behind the appellant’s automobile. Pulaski “turned and saw us and started walking real fast towards the pavement,” dropping the tinfoil in the gutter.
Patti went after him, and identifying himself as a policeman, told him to stop and arrested him. Patti picked up the tinfoil, opened it and found in it two capsules containing a white powder. In the meantime, Detective Zakitis got out of the police car and walked toward the passenger side of the Cadillac. He saw Patterson throw a small green box from the automobile and some white capsules spilled from the box.
Patterson and the appellant were arrested. Zakitis recovered the box and 94 capsules, some of which were in the box and some of which had spilled out when the box was thrown away. The contents of the two capsules wrapped in tinfoil and the 94 capsules in the green box were analyzed by a chemist for the United States Customs Labora 134 tory and found to contain heroin hydrochloride, an opium derivative. The capsules and the report of the chemist were admitted in evidence without objection.
We think it clear
This is a preview of Gladney v. State. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.