Maryland case law › Haddock v. Stewart

Haddock v. Stewart

232 Md. 139 (1963) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: AffirmedSybert, J.✓ Good law
HoldingHaddock sued the estate of Thomas Gerald Hill and James B.

Sybert, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. The appellant, Joseph W. Haddock, brought suit in the Circuit Court for St. Mary’s County against the estate of Thomas Gerald Hill and the appellee, James B. Stewart, Jr., for injuries and property damage sustained by him in a three-car collision which resulted, he alleged, from an illegal automobile race between Hill and Stewart. On removal to the Circuit Court for Howard County the case was tried before a jury. At the close of the plaintiff’s case the court, upon motion, directed a verdict for the defendant Stewart on the ground that there was no legally sufficient evidence that he had engaged in a race with Hill, and Haddock appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Stewart.

A judgment obtained by Haddock against Hill’s estate is not involved in this appeal. The unfortunate accident, which claimed two lives, occurred at about 5 P.M. on January 31, 1961, near Bryantown in Charles County. Haddock was proceeding north on State Route 5 toward Waldorf, about five or six car lengths behind another automobile operated by a Lieut. Commander Baker, both running at about 45 miles per hour.

As the two vehicles were following a gradual curve to the right in the road, a third automobile being operated by Hill in the opposite direction at a high rate of speed, went out of control, crossed over the center-line of the highway and collided with the Baker car head-on. It then caromed off and struck the Haddock vehicle broadside. Baker and Hill were killed and Haddock was seriously injured. The width of Route 5 at the scene does not appear, but a photograph admitted in evidence shows it to be a two-lane paved road of average width, divided by a solid double line.

The testimony was that the shoulders were covered by a few inches of snow, but that the traveled portion was dry and clear. The speed limit was 50 miles per hour. 141 The appellee, Stewart, said he was 600 to 800 feet behind Hill when the accident occurred and that he saw only Hill’s collision with Baker’s car. He testified he observed the Hill vehicle “hit the soft shoulder, his car skidded around and he cut back into the highway and skidded into the oncoming car.” Haddock said he didn’t see the Hill car until it crashed into the Baker vehicle and then came toward him. He did not see the Stewart automobile at all.

Hill being dead, Haddock had perforce to rely upon the testimony of Stewart in his effort to show that the latter had engaged in a speed contest with Hill. The plaintiff called Stewart as his witness, and the substance of his testimony follows. Stewart, who lived in Bryantown, had stopped in a service station in Waldorf to buy some gasoline. Hill pulled in behind him and got out of his car, but did not purchase any gasoline.

Stewart said that he didn’t know Hill and that they had no conversation then or at any other time. Stewart was 21 years of age; Hill (it was otherwise proved) was 23. Both were driving black 1958 Chevrolet Impalas, Stewart’s automobile having been altered to lower the rear part of the body. Stewart left the gas station and headed south on Route 5 toward Bryantown, about 7 miles distant.

He said he did not see the Hill car again until, about a mile and a half out of Waldorf, Hill pulled alongside him on a curve at the top of a hill. Stewart said he was going 45 to 50 miles per hour, and that Hill ran abreast of him and waved for him to come on — indicating a challenge to race. Stewart testified that “I pulled almost off the road so he could get back in the right lane, something could have been coming up over the hill.” After passing Stewart, Hill speeded up his car and, although Stewart continued down the road, he said he drove at only 45-50 miles per hour. Three times thereafter, Stewart testified, Hill slowed down and waited for him to catch up, whereupon Hill would wave him on and speed up again.

The last time this happened, Stewart said, was about a mile from the point of the accident. He testified that Hill sped away at about 80 miles per hour, but that he maintained his own speed at 55 miles per hour. He stated that he had refused on each occasion to participate in a race, and in fact had not done so. 142 The appellant relies strongly upon a signed statement which his counsel obtained from Stewart a week after the accident, reading in part: “He waived [sic] to me to race him. I didn’t race and all the way from Waldorf for about seven miles (to Bryantown) he kept speeding up and then waiting for me to get up to him and then would waive [sic] for me to race him.

I was going between 60 and 70 m.p.h. coming down the road and at times he would go up to 80 m.p.h.” The appellant maintains that Stewart’s admission of high speed requires the conclusion that he was racing with Hill. On the stand, however, Stewart (who said he had completed only seven grades in school) testified that he had only told counsel that he might have gotten up to 60-70 miles per hour, and said: “I don’t remember going sixty and seventy. I might have when I passed some cars down the road. That would be the only time.” He said he passed the cars about three miles from where the accident occurred, and that Hill had passed them “long before I did”.

It is noted that in the statement

This is a preview of Haddock v. Stewart. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.