Maryland case law › Hanson-Metayer v. Rach
Hanson-Metayer v. Rach
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: Dismissed✓ Good law
SummaryThis matter came before the Court of Appeals of Maryland on a petition for writ of certiorari, which the Court granted and then heard argument on March 1, 2018. In a one-page per curiam order, the Court dismissed the writ of certiorari with costs, stating that the petition had been improvidently granted. The order contains no recitation of facts, no statement of the questions presented, no reasoning, and no discussion of the merits. The only substantive action is the dismissal of the certiorari petition. Because the opinion consists solely of a dispositional order and does not contain the court's reasoning, no legal holdings, factual findings, or doctrinal analysis can be extracted from the text.
📖 Open the full case in RecordCite — full opinion, AI chat, highlights & citator →Circuit Court for Prince George’s County Case No. CAL17-07312 Argued: March 1, 2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 59 September Term, 2017 ELIZABETH HANSON-METAYER v. LESLIE RACH Barbera, C.J. Greene Adkins McDonald Watts Hotten Getty, JJ. PER CURIAM ORDER Filed: March 1, 2018 ELIZABETH HANSON-METAYER * IN THE * COURT OF APPEALS v. * OF MARYLAND * No. 59 LESLIE RACH * September Term, 2017 PER CURIAM ORDER The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case having been granted and argued, it is this 1st day of March, 2018, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted. /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge