Maryland case law › Hernandez v. State

Hernandez v. State

Unreported (2018) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: Vacated✓ Good law
SummaryThis case arises from a per curiam order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, issued October 17, 2018, in the matter of Jafet L. Hernandez v. State of Maryland. The Court granted Hernandez's petition for a writ of certiorari, considered the case, and with a majority concurring, vacated the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals. The Court remanded the case to the Court of Special Appeals with directions to affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince George's County. The Court's order explicitly states that the affirmance is to be for the reasons set forth in the opinion in James E. Bowie v. State of Maryland, No. 55, September Term, 2017 (August 29, 2018). Costs were ordered to be paid by the Petitioner, Hernandez. The per curiam order does not contain any independent reasoning, facts, or legal analysis; it relies entirely on the Bowie opinion for its rationale. The order is si
📖 Open the full case in RecordCite — full opinion, AI chat, highlights & citator →

Circuit Court for Prince George’s County Case No. CT06-1010X IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 48 September Term, 2018 JAFET L. HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF MARYLAND Barbera, C.J. Greene Adkins McDonald Watts Hotten Getty, JJ. Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document " authentic. PER CURIAM ORDER 2018-10-17 11:05-04:00 Filed: October 17, 2018 Suzanne C. Johnson, Acting Clerk JAFET I. HERNANDEZ * IN THE * COURT OF APPEALS v. * OF MARYLAND * No. 48 STATE OF MARYLAND * September Term, 2018 PER CURIAM ORDER The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case, it is this 17th day of October, 2018, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that, a majority of the Court concurring, the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court with directions to affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County for the reasons set forth in the opinion in James E. Bowie v. State of Maryland, No. 55, September Term, 2017 (August 29, 2018). Costs to be paid by Petitioner. /s/ Clayton Greene, Jr. Senior Judge