Maryland case law › In the Matter of K.E.

In the Matter of K.E.

471 Md. 89 (2020) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: AffirmedBarbera, C.J.✓ Good law
HoldingK.E., an applicant for admission to the Maryland Bar, requested test accommodations for the upcoming bar examination under Board Rule 3(b), specifically seeking 100% extra time in addition to a private room and 15 minutes off the clock per session.

Argued: September 15, 2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. No. 4 September Term, 2020 IN THE MATTER OF K.E. Barbera, C.J. McDonald Watts Hotten Getty Booth Biran, JJ. ORDER Filed: September 17, 2020 Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. 2020-09-17 10:13-04:00 Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk IN THE MATTER OF K.E. * IN THE * COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND * Misc. No. 4 * September Term, 2020 ORDER WHEREAS, K.E., an applicant for admission to the Maryland Bar, has requested test accommodations pursuant to Board Rule 3(b) of the rules of the State Board of Law Examiners (“State Board”) with respect to the upcoming bar examination, WHEREAS, pursuant to Board Rule 3(c)(2), the State Board referred K.E.’s request and supporting documentation to an independent qualified expert for review, WHEREAS, based upon the recommendation of the expert, the State Board determined that test accommodations should be provided to K.E. in the form of 25% extra time, a private room, and 15 minutes off the clock per session, WHEREAS, pursuant to Board Rule 3(d) and Maryland Rule 19-208(b), K.E. appealed the State Board’s determination to the Accommodations Review Committee, and sought 100% extra time instead of 25% extra time, in addition to

This is a preview of In the Matter of K.E.. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.