Maryland case law › Joce's Lessee v. Harris

Joce's Lessee v. Harris

1 Md. 196 (1754) · Provincial Court of Maryland (Kent County); affirmed by the Court of Appeals
Provincial Court of Maryland (Kent County); affirmed by the Court of AppealsDisposition: Affirmed✓ Good law
HoldingEjectment for a 400-acre tract called Philips Choice in Kent County.

EJECTMENT for a tract of land called Philips Choice, in Kent County, containing four hundred acres. At the trial of this cause, the plaintiff, in order to make out his title, produced and gave in evidence a patent dated the 1st of April, 1686, to Philip Holleadger, for a tract of land called Philip’s Choice, lying in Cecil County, on the south side of Sassafras River, ■ Jkc. containing 400 acres, more or less, as by certificate dated 10th of November, 1683. The plaintiff then produced and offered to give in evidence a deed duly executed, acknowledged, and recorded, from Philip Holleadger, the patentee, to a certain Thomas face, dated the 1st of July, 1689, for “ all that “ parcel or tract of land called Varino, containing 400 “ acres, lying and being in Cecil County, on the south side “ of Sassafras River, being1 taken up by the said Philip “ Holleadger as by patent for the said land bearing date “ the Is# of August, 1686, may more at, large appear; as “ also one other parcel or tract of land called Bridge “ Point, lying and being in Cecil County, on the south ££ side of Sassafras River, containing 20 acres, being taken “ up by Nicholas Hodgson as by patent for the said land, “bearing date the 1st of May, 1685, may more at large “ appear; and since which time conveyed by the said Ni- “ cholas Hodgson to Philip Holleadger, as by deed bearing “ date the 6th of March last past,” &c. And the plaintiff also proved, that a certain Thomas Joce, of whom the lessor of the

This is a preview of Joce's Lessee v. Harris. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.