Maryland case law › Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State

191 Md. 447 (1948) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: DismissedHenderson, J.✓ Good law
HoldingJunior Johnson was tried before a trial magistrate in Caroline County on a charge of assault and battery, found guilty, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and costs.

Henderson, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Junior Johnson was tried before a trial magistrate in Caroline County, on a charge of assault and battery, found guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and costs. The State entered an appeal from the judgment and sentence to the Circuit Court for Caroline County, where he was tried by the Court, found guilty and sentenced to four months in the House of Correction. His appeal challenges the action of the Court in sustaining the State’s demurrer to his plea to the jurisdiction, his plea of Autre Fois Convict, and his motion to quash the proceedings in the Circuit Court.

The appellant contends that the State had no right to appeal from the conviction and sentence of the Magistrate. 450 We think the case is controlled by our recent decision in Robb v. State, 190 Md. 641 , 60 A. 2d 211 . In that case the appellant was tried before a trial magistrate and found not guilty. The State appealed to the Circuit Court, where the accused was found guilty and sentenced to twelve months in the House of Correction, after the court had sustained a demurrer to his plea of double jeopardy. We held that the Circuit Court had jurisdiction, that its judgment and sentence were final, and dismissed the appeal to this court.

We pointed out that the question turned upon the language of section 13 of Article 52 of the Code, which provides in part: “If after a trial before the Trial Magistrate either party shall feel aggrieved by his judgment there shall be a right of appeal within ten days to the Circuit Court for the county in which the alleged offense is charged to have been committed, * * We held that there could be no valid objection, under the Federal or State Constitution, to a statutory change in the common law rules as to double jeopardy. The appellant attempts to distinguish this case on

This is a preview of Johnson v. State. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.