Maryland case law › Keaney v. Keaney

Keaney v. Keaney

72 Md. 41 (1890) · Maryland Court of Appeals
Maryland Court of AppealsDisposition: ReversedStone✓ Good law
HoldingThis was an amicable suit to construe the will of Michael Keaney, which was short and evidently drawn by a person unaccustomed to such business.

Stone, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an amicable suit to ascertain the true construction of the will of Michael Keaney. The will is very short, and evidently drawn by a person entirely unaccustomed to such business. The will will be found set out in the statement of the case.

In the will the testator uses these expressions: “To my wife Bridget Keaney, I will and bequeath the house south-east corner of Leadenhall and West; also the house 191 Johnson street, who is to receive the rents during her life of those two houses. After her death the Leadenhall house is to go to my son, Frank. In case of Frank's death, the property is to be divided among the next heirs.'' The first question that arises, is, what estate did Bridget Keaney take in the two houses bequeathed to her? We think it quite clear that she only took a life estate.

The idea, although awkwardly expressed, was to give her the rents of these two houses for her life. It is absolutely certain that she only had a life estate in the Leadenhall house, because after her death the 44 remainder in that house was bequeathed to his son, Frank. The same words are used in reference to both houses, except that he did not dispose of the Johnson street house after the death of his wife. The' testator may have inadvertently omitted to dispose of the remainder in the Johnson street house.

But whether he did- or not, we think the words used by the testator that his

This is a preview of Keaney v. Keaney. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.