Maryland case law › Keyser v. Calvary Brethren Church

Keyser v. Calvary Brethren Church

192 Md. 520 (1949) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: AffirmedMarbury, C. J.✓ Good law
HoldingMartha J.

Marbury, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for Washington County, construing Paragraph 4 of the 522 will of Martha J. Uhler, and directing the executor of her estate to distribute to the appellee the bequest of $1,000 contained in that paragraph. The case was brought by the executor, and the residuary legatees, who were parties defendant below, are the appellants here. The testatrix died on May 14, 1942.

By the 4th para-: graph of her will, which is the one here in question, she made the following bequest: “4th. I hereby give, devise and bequeath unto The Calvary Brethren Corbett Street Chapel (Rev. A. M. Dixon Pastor) the sum of one thous- and ($1,000.00) Dollars for the building of a Church to be held in trust for a period of five years, if they do not build within five years then this returns to my estate.” The residue of the estate was given to the three appellants. The Calvary Brethren Church (the present name of the legatee) purchased a lot of ground by contract of sale dated June 11, 1947, securing the deed on July 2, 1947, and started the construction of a church on this lot by the excavation of the basement on July 25, 1947. A building permit was applied for on August 4, 1947, and the permit was granted on August 14, 1947.

In December, 1947, the congregation began meeting in the basement. The building has not been completed. All of this was done more than five years after the death of the testatrix. The testimony of the Rev. Mr. Dixon, pastor of the church, showed that the church had bought three other lots on July 12, 1943, within the five years, upon which it had intended to build a church.

Subsequently the present lots upon which the church was built were bought, the church authorities thinking them a more desirable location, and the other lots were sold. The United States Government had restricted the use of building materials on April 9, 1942, and those restrictions were not lifted until June 30, 1947. Mr. Russell B. Keener, a contractor of Hagerstown, was consulted by the building committee of the church with reference to building on the three original lots, some time in the winter of 1946-47. In 523 January of 1947, Mr. Keener testified that he consulted the Federal Housing Administration’s office, and was advised that a permit would not be granted, until materials were more available.

No formal application was made, but it seems to have been clear that steel and lumber, which were necessary for the construction, could not have been gotten during the period between April, 1942 and June, 1947, without a priority granted by the War Production Board. No application was made for such priority, but Mr. Keener had made an application for another church during the' period in question, this being for some interior decoration. This application had been rejected at first, but was subsequently approved, because some of the materials were located in the town, and were given for the purpose. The work done on the other church did not require the use of any steel.

We have first to determine whether the condition attached to the bequest in the 4th paragraph of the will is a condition precedent or a condition subsequent. That depends, of course, upon the intention of the testator, but if a gift is first given and then a condition is added by later words, such condition is generally held to be one of termination and not of initiation. Gittinger v. Farmers & Mechanics’ National Bank, 180 Md. 640 , pages 643-644, 26 A. 2d 414 . The decisions in this respect are an outgrowth of the principle that the law favors the early vesting of estates.

Lee v. Waltjen, 141 Md. 450 .

This is a preview of Keyser v. Calvary Brethren Church. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.