Maryland case law › Leonard v. State

Leonard v. State

200 Md. 58 (1952) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: AffirmedMarkell, J.✓ Good law
HoldingLeonard appealed his conviction for violating Maryland gambling laws, challenging the denial of his motion to quash a search warrant and the admission of evidence seized under it.

Markell, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an appeal from a judgment on conviction of violating gambling laws. The only question presented is whether a motion to quash a search warrant was properly denied and evidence obtained by search under the warrant was properly admitted. The sufficiency, in law and in fact, of the evidence (if admissible) is not questioned.

The question is, whether the facts stated in the affidavit and application for the search warrant are sufficient to show probable cause. The affidavit and application of Captain Emerson, dated May 10, 1951, states that: The premises in question are “the premises on the second floor, combination restaurant and poolroom, 1019% W. North Avenue, a two-story brick building”. On May 7, 1951, a named officer watched the premises from 7 to 8:15 p.m. At 60 7:10 p.m. the officer was standing on the southeast corner of Madison and North Avenues, when two white men walked up on the corner and began talking.

One said, “If I don’t start winning soon on these night games, I’ll have to stop betting.” The other man said, “You worry too much, come let’s go up to Tiger’s, he owes me twenty bucks from yesterday’s game.” The two men then entered the premises 1019% W. North Avenue. The officer then walked east on North Avenue, past No. 1019% where the two men had entered. There was a white man, described by age, height and weight, standing in the doorway looking up and down the street. The officer crossed the street and stood on the northwest corner of Eutaw Place and North Avenue and watched.

Between 7:25 and 8:15 p.m. he saw twenty-five white men enter the premises No. 1019%. Of the twenty-five only three came out. Each time a white man entered or left the premises, the described man “would look up and down the street in a suspicious manner, acting in the capacity of a watchman”. On May 8, 1951 the officer again watched the premises from 7 to 8:15 p.m.

Upon arrival at Madison and North Avenues the same man was standing in the same doorway “looking up and down the street in a suspicious manner”. Between 7 and 7:30 p.m., the officer saw ten white men enter the premises 1019% W. North Avenue. At 7:35 p.m. the officer was standing on the corner of Madison and North Avenues, near a group of men who were talking about

This is a preview of Leonard v. State. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.