Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: VacatedPer Curiam✓ Good law
SummaryThis is a per curiam order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, not a full opinion. The Court granted Mark O'Neil's petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals, and remanded the case to that court for further consideration in light of Simmons and McGouldrick v. State, a recently filed decision of the Court of Appeals (No. 28, September Term, 2015, filed February 22, 2016). The order does not recite the underlying facts, the legal questions presented, or any reasoning. It simply applies the standard practice of vacating and remanding for reconsideration when an intervening appellate decision may affect the outcome. Costs in the Court of Appeals were assessed against the Respondent, and costs in the Court of Special Appeals were to abide the result. Because the text contains only a dispositional order and no substantive analysis, no holdings, fac
Circuit C0urt for Baltimore City CaSe N0. 1130380l8,019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND N0. 106 September Term, 2015 MARK O'NEIL W@ STATE OF MARYLAND Barbera, C.Jg Battag1ia Greene AdkinS McD0na1d Watts H0tten, JJ. PER CURIAM ORDER Filed: March 25, 2016 MARK O'NElL * lN THE * COURT ®F APPEAL$ vs * OF MARYLAND * NO. 106 STATE OF MARYLAND * September Term, 2015 PER CURIAM ORDER The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case, it is this 25W day of March, 20l6, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, Vacated, and the case is remanded. to that Court for further consideration in light of §i@mons_and_McGouldrick v. S;ate,.=;_i Md. _J P;___ A.3d _H _$(No. 28, September Term, 20l5, filed February 22, 20l6). Costs in this Court to be paid by the Respondent and costs in the Court of Special Appeals to abide the result. /s/ Mary E|Ien Barbera Chief Judge