Maryland case law › Peoples National Bank v. American Fidelity Fire Insurance

Peoples National Bank v. American Fidelity Fire Insurance

39 Md. App. 614 (1978) · Maryland Court of Special Appeals
Maryland Court of Special AppealsDisposition: AffirmedMoore, J.✓ Good law
HoldingAmerican Fidelity Fire Insurance Company, surety on a payment bond for Floors, Inc., paid a subcontractor $44,200 and arranged for the United States to issue a Treasury check for $49,314.47 payable jointly to 'Floors, Inc.' and 'American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company.' Floors, Inc.

Moore, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an appeal from an Order of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County (Ernest A. Loveless, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company, and awarding damages 615 against the defendant, Peoples National Bank of Maryland, for wrongful payment to a single indorser on a check made payable to joint payees. We are in agreement with the ruling of the lower court that a cause of action in conversion was stated under Md. Com. Law Code Ann. § 3-419 (1975), 1 and we adopt the opinion of Judge Loveless as set forth below: “Plaintiff, American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company (hereafter, American Fidelity), brought this action in conversion against the defendant, Peoples National Bank of Maryland.

Both parties have moved for summary judgment. The facts are not in dispute. “The plaintiff was surety on a payment bond for work to be performed by Floors, Inc. for the United States of America. Floors, Inc. was bound contractually to furnish and install stairway landings and treads for Federal Building No. 2 in Arlington, Virginia. A subcontractor, American Mason Safety Tread Co., Inc., furnished the landings and treads to Floors, Inc., demanded payment of $44,200 from Floors, Inc., but was not paid.

The subcontractor then demanded payment from American Fidelity. American Fidelity paid the $44,200 from its own funds and then arranged for payment to be made directly from the United States of America to itself and Floors, Inc., to permit deduction of the sum of $44,200. The United States of America issued a check of the United States Treasury drawn on the General Services Administration in the amount of forty-nine thousand 616 three hundred fourteen dollars and forty-seven cents ($49,314.47) payable as follows: ‘Floors, Inc. American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company 8400 Truck Way Capitol Heights, Md. 20037.’ “Floors, Inc. indorsed the check by way of a rubber stamped indorsement as follows: ‘For Deposit Only Floors, Inc.’ “On January 6, 1976, the defendant, Peoples National Bank of Maryland, accepted for deposit the check in question. The only indorsement which appeared on the check was the rubber stamped indorsement of Floors, Inc. The defendant did not obtain the indorsement of American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company.

The defendant credited the amount of the check to the account of Floors, Inc. This action was taken without the knowledge of the plaintiff. A significant portion of the funds deposited was withdrawn within a week. Plaintiff was required to pay the subcontractor under the terms of its surety agreement, and upon default of Floors, Inc. was required to arrange for completion of the contract. “Following acceptance of the check by Peoples National Bank, the check was forwarded to the Federal Reserve Bank of Baltimore City, which gave credit to Peoples National Bank, and the Federal Reserve then forwarded the check to the United States Treasury, which credited the Federal Reserve. “Plaintiff, American Fidelity, argues that, since the defendant bank credited the entire proceeds of the check to one of two jointly-named payees without knowledge of or indorsement by the other payee, it 617 exercised dominion over the check which amounted to conversion. Reliance is placed upon Md. Com.

Law Code Ann. § 3-116 (1975), which provides as follows: ‘An instrument payable to the order of two or more persons (a) If in the alternative is payable to any one of them and may be negotiated, discharged or enforced by any of them who has possession of it; (b) If not in the alternative is payable to all of them and may be negotiated, discharged or enforced only by all of them.’ In plaintiffs view, since the two payees were listed on the check without any indication on the face of the check that it was payable in the alternative, the instrument could not be

This is a preview of Peoples National Bank v. American Fidelity Fire Insurance. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.