Shearman v. Shearman

The hill in this case alleged that the plaintiff had been induced to execute a certain deed of conveyance in consequence of the fraud and undue influence practiced upon her and prayed that the same he annulled. The trial Court sustained a demurrer on the ground that the allegations of fraud, etc., in the hill were insufficient. This Court holds the allegations of the hill in this respect to he sufficient and remands the cause for further proceedings.