State v. Bowman

Unreported (2016) · Court of Appeals of Maryland

Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: Other✓ Good law

SummaryThis is a per curiam order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, not a full opinion. The Court granted the State's petition for a writ of certiorari in light of its recent holding in State v. James Leslie Adams-Bey, Jr., No. 105, Sept. Term, 2015 (filed August 25, 2016). The order vacates the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals and remands the case to that Court with instructions to vacate the judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince George's County and remand to the circuit court. The circuit court is directed to determine whether Respondent Darrell Bowman waived any claim under Unger v. State, 427 Md. 383, 48 A.3d 242 (2012), given that Bowman's trial occurred after this Court issued its opinion in Stevenson v. State, 289 Md. 167, 423 A.2d 558 (1980). The order does not contain any reasoning, facts, or analysis beyond the procedural directive. It is a brief administrative order tha

📖 Open the full case in RecordCite — full opinion, AI chat, highlights & citator →

Circuit Court for Prince George’s County Case No. CT85-101 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 108 September Term, 2015 STATE OF MARYLAND v. DARRELL BOWMAN Barbera, C.J. Greene Adkins McDonald Watts Hotten Getty, JJ. PER CURIAM ORDER Filed: August 26, 2016 STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * COURT OF APPEALS v. * OF MARYLAND * No. 108 DARRELL BOWMAN * September Term, 2015 PER CURIAM ORDER The Court having considered and granted the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case in light of the Court’s holding in State v. James Leslie Adams-Bey, Jr.,___ Md.___, ___ A.3d.___, No. 105, Sept. Term, 2015 (filed August 25, 2016), it is this 26th day of August, 2016, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court with instructions to vacate the judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, and remand the case to the circuit court with instructions to determine whether Respondent waived any claim under Unger v. State, 427 Md. 383 , 48 A.3d 242 (2012), given that Respondent’s trial occurred after this Court issued its opinion in Stevenson v. State, 289 Md. 167 , 423 A.2d 558 (1980). Prince George’s County to pay costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals. ________________________ Chief Judge