Maryland case law › State v. Burroughs

State v. Burroughs

Unreported (2014) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: VacatedBarbera, C.J. (per curiam order)✓ Good law
SummaryThis is a per curiam order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, not a full opinion. The Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the case of State of Maryland v. Damerum Burroughs, No. 119, September Term, 2013. Without hearing argument or issuing a reasoned opinion, the Court vacated the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals and remanded the case to that court for further consideration in light of four recently decided cases: Nalls v. State, 437 Md. 674, 89 A.3d 1126 (2014); Melvin v. State, 437 Md. 674, 89 A.3d 1126 (2014); Szwed v. State, 438 Md. 1, 89 A.3d 1143 (2014); and Morgan v. State, 438 Md. 11, 89 A.3d 1149 (2014). The order does not state the legal questions presented, the facts of the case, the reasoning of the Court of Special Appeals, or any holding on the merits. It simply directs the intermediate appellate court to reconsider its prior decision in light of
📖 Open the full case in RecordCite — full opinion, AI chat, highlights & citator →

Circuit Court for Baltimore City CC#112180031 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND No.119 September Term, 2013 STATE OF MARYLAND v. DAMERUM BURROUGHS Barbera, C.J. Harrell Battaglia Greene Adkins McDonald Watts, JJ. PER CURIAM ORDER Filed: July 21, 2014 STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * COURT OF APPEALS v. * OF MARYLAND * No. 119 DAMERUM BURROUGHS * September Term, 2013 PER CURIAM ORDER The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case, it is this 21st day of July, 2014, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated and the case is remanded to that Court for further consideration in light of Nalls v. State, 437 Md. 674 , 89 A.3d 1126 (2014); Melvin v. State, 437 Md. 674 , 89 A.3d 1126 (2014); Szwed v. State, 438 Md. 1 , 89 A.3d 1143 (2014); and Morgan v. State, 438 Md. 11 , 89 A.3d 1149 (2014). Costs in this Court to be paid by the Respondent, and costs in the Court of Special Appeals to abide the result. /s/Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge