Maryland case law › Taylor v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

Taylor v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

213 Md. 646 (1975) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: DeniedCollins, J.✓ Good law
HoldingPetitioner sought leave to appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus following his conviction in the Criminal Court of Baltimore on a four-count indictment.

Collins, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an application for leave to appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was convicted in the Criminal Court of Baltimore on an indictment in four counts. The first count charged him on February 1, 1956, with unlawful possession of a narcotic drug and the second count with unlawful control of a narcotic drug.

The third and fourth counts, under the provisions of Code, 1951, Article 27, Section 369, charged that he was convicted and sentenced for the crime of having in his possession and administering a certain narcotic drug on October 2, 1945, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and sentenced to serve three to six years in the Eastern Penitentiary, and having been so convicted and sentenced, he was guilty of a second offense of the crimes charged in the first and second counts. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced to five years in the Maryland House of Correction. Petitioner contends that his conviction violates “the ex post facto provision in the United States Constitution”. Code, 1939, Article 27, Section 352, Chapter 59, Section 285V, Acts of 1935, provided that, for violation of the narcotic laws, for the first offense, the punishment should be a fine not exceeding $1,000.00 or imprisonment not exceeding three years, or both, and for a subsequent offense a fine of not more than $3,000.00 or imprisonment not exceeding five years, or both.

By Chapter 466, Acts of 1951, Code, 1951, Article 27, Section 369, the penalty for the first offense was a fine of not more than $1,000.00 and imprisonment for not less than two or more than five years. Also, a provision was added making

This is a preview of Taylor v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.