Maryland case law › Thomas H. Quinn, Inc. v. Realty Investment Co.
Thomas H. Quinn, Inc. v. Realty Investment Co.
Court of Appeals of MarylandDisposition: Dismissed✓ Good law
HoldingThis is a per curiam opinion by the Court of Appeals of Maryland dismissing an appeal for failure to comply with the Maryland Rules governing the contents of the printed extract.
Per Curiam. Maryland Rule 828 b 1 a requires that the printed extract shall include “the judgment appealed from together with the opinion or charge of the lower court, if any.” 309 In this case, in which the appellant seeks to strike down Rule 542 of the Sixth Circuit which provides that the right of removal is waived unless a written suggestion of removal is filed within 45 days after the cause is at issue, the parties agreed upon a statement of undisputed facts under Rule 828 g but neither brief nor extract contains the judgment appealed from. We deem it appropriate to dismiss the appeal under Rule 828 i; Roy v. Hyde, 261 Md. 283 , 274 A.2d 389 (1970). Appeal dismissed, costs to be paid by wppellant.