Maryland case law › Wellersburg & West Newton Plank Road Co. v. Hoffman

Wellersburg & West Newton Plank Road Co. v. Hoffman

9 Md. 559 (1856) · Maryland Court of Appeals
Maryland Court of AppealsDisposition: ReversedEccleston, J.✓ Good law
HoldingThis appeal arose from a judgment entered against the defendant, Hoffman, on a promissory note given to the Wellersburg and West Newton Plank Road Company for forty shares of its capital stock.

Eccleston, J., delivered the opinion of this court. The appellant claims a reversal of the judgment in this case, because the court committed an error by instructing the jury: “ That the commissioners who were authorised by the laws of Pennsylvania aforesaid to open boobs and receive subscriptions to the capital stock, were the only persons who had authority to receive subscriptions to the said capital stock of four thousand shares of twenty-five dollars per share, specified in said special act, and that no power existed in said company to receive subscriptions for any of said shares, and that the said pretended promissory note purporting to be made to said company, in consideration of forty shares, is a nudum pactum, and without authority of law.” By the 18th section of the special act referred to, commissioners were appointed “to open books, receive subscriptions, and organize a company, by the name, style and title of { The Wellersburg and West Newton Plank Road Company,’ to locate and construct a plank road from, &c., .... subject to all the provisions and restrictions of ‘ An act regulating Turn 566 pike and Plank Road Companies,’ approved the twenty-sixth day of January, one thousand, eight hundred and forty-nine, and the supplements thereto, as far as the same are not inconsistent with this and the following sections.” The 19th section of the special act provides: “That the capital stock of said company shall consist of four thousand shares, of twenty-five dollars per share; provided that said company may from time to time, at a meeting called-for that purpose, increase their capital stock to such an amount as, in their opinion, may be required to complete the same according to the true intent and meaning of this act.” The 1st section of the general act directs, how commissioners named in a special act shall proceed in regard to receiving subscriptions for stock. And the 2nd section then enacts, that, “ When twenty persons, or more, shall have subscribed ten per centwn on the capital stock provided for by such special act of Assembly, the said commissioners respectively may, or when the whole number of shares authorised as aforesaid shall be subscribed, they shall certify under their hands and seals the names of the subscribers, and the number of shares subscribed by each, to the Governor of the Commonwealth; whereupon it shall and may be lawful for the Governor, by letters patent under his hand and seal of State, to create and erect the subscribers; and if the subscription be not full at the time, then those who shall afterwards subscribe to the number aforesaid, into one body politic and corporate, in deed and in law, by the name, style and title designated by such special act; and by such name the said subscribers shall have perpetual succession, and all privileges and franchises incident to a corporation, and shall be capable of taking and holding the capital stock, and the increase and profits thereof, and of enlarging the same by new subscriptions, in such manner and form as they shall think proper, if such enlargement shall be found necessary to fulfil the intent of such special act.” The 10th section also provides, that, “Whenever it shall be ascertained that the capital stock of such company is not sufficient to complete their road, according to the true intent and meaning of this act, it shall and may be lawful for the presi 567 dent and managers, at a stated or special meeting, convened according to the provisions of this act or their own by-laws, to increase the number of shares to such an extent as they shall deem sufficient to accomplish the work, and to demand and receive the moneys subscribed for such additional shares, in like manner and under like penalties, as are provided by this act in the case of the original subscriptions.” Prom the letters patent of the Governor of Pennsylvania it appears, that when they were granted the stock subscribed for amounted, in the whole, to two thousand and thirty-four shares, and, therefore, being more than ten per centum of four thousand, the Governor had authority to act under the 2nd section of the general law. And in compliance with which he created and erected those who had then subscribed, and those who should afterwards subscribe, “into one body politic and corporate.” The defendant did not subscribe before the commissioners, but his subscription was obtained by G. W. Richardson, “who was appointed agent of said company to get subscriptions to said capital stock in Cumberland, Maryland, by Thomas Shriver, the president of said company, after the issuing of said letters patent,” Such is the admission stated in the record.

And it is also admitted, that the four thousand shares of stock never have been all subscribed for. Under the second section referred to, when twenty persons or more shall have taken ten per centum or more of the stock allowed by law, the commissioners may make their certificate to the Governor,

This is a preview of Wellersburg & West Newton Plank Road Co. v. Hoffman. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.