Maryland case law › Williams v. State

Williams v. State

7 Md. App. 241 (1969) · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Court of Special Appeals of MarylandDisposition: RemandedThompson, J.✓ Good law
HoldingPatricia Williams was indicted on three counts: larceny, shoplifting, and receiving stolen goods.

Thompson, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Patricia Williams, the appellant, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Judge Ralph W. Powers presiding without a jury, of grand larceny and sentenced to a term of three years. On appeal, she contends the conviction and sentence were void because they were based upon a previously abandoned count in the indictment, and that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. The record shows that Patricia Williams was indicted on three counts: larceny, shoplifting, and receiving stolen goods.

On April 11, 1968, she entered a plea of guilty to count two of the indictment (shoplifting). The transcript of the proceedings indicates that after the plea of guilty was made, the following exchange took place between the Assistant State’s Attorney and the court. “(Mr. Bonner) Your Honor at this time, if the Court accepts the plea of guilty from the defendant, Patricia Williams, in case 7740, the State would waive the prosecution on Counts Number One and Number Three. “(The Court) Very well, then the Court will accept the plea of guilty to the second count, and will refer this case to the Department of Parole and Probation for presentence investigation.” The docket entry for April 11, 1968 contains the following notation: “State abandons prosecution as to Counts One and Three of the Indictment.” On May 29, 1968, Williams appeared before the court and the following exchange took place. “(The Court) Before we start this, the de 243 fendant’s version in the presentence investigation is that she found a bag on the floor and she picked it up and they apprehended her. Under those circumstances I think we better strike out the plea of guilty and enter a plea of not guilty and have a trial on the merits in this case, because I am not going to sentence somebody on a plea of guilty when they say they are not guilty of the offense. “(Mr. Thomas) I wholeheartedly concur with your Honor about that. “(The Court) The plea of guilty will be stricken and a plea of not guilty generally will be entered in the case, and we will ask, Mr. State’s Attorney, that it be set for trial as soon as possible. “(Mr. Bonner) I came across that this morning. I already discussed it with counsel.

I told him the Court would probably not accept the plea of guilty and he agreed with me. “(The Court) Very well.” The docket entry for May 29, 1968, states that the plea of “guilty” was stricken and that a plea of “not guilty generally” was entered. The transcript of the trial indicates that defendant was tried on all three counts of the original indictment. The State called as a witness, William McKinley, security officer for the Montgomery Ward Store at Capital Plaza, Prince George’s County. McKinley testified that he had been employed by that store for five years, and that on October 17, 1967, at about 4 o’clock or 4:30 p.m. he saw the defendant, Patricia Williams, in the Fashion Department in Montgomery Ward accompanied by another woman and a man.

He testified that he saw them open a big brown paper bag; that the other woman held the bag while Patricia Williams rolled up two suits, dropped the suits into the bag, and walked out of the store. He stated that he saw the other woman and man walk off in an 244 other direction, and that he stopped Patricia Williams outside of the store’s door while his partner chased the other two who had driven off in a car. McKinley testified that after stopping Patricia Williams, he told her that she was under arrest and brought her back into the store’s security office. McKinley stated that his partner, Officer Hall, was unable to apprehend

This is a preview of Williams v. State. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.