Iverson v. Jones

Bond, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court. The appeal is from the sustaining of a demurrer, and dismissal of the appellant’s petition for the writ of mandamus to require the Secretary of State to certify, under the Code, art. 33, secs. 49 to 52, names of nominees for office to be voted for at the election to be held on November 3rd, 1936. After argument was heard, the court came to the conclusion that the order must be affirmed, and so ordered on October 16th, 1936, deferring the filing of a ⁶⁵¹ reasoned opinion. This order will be amended by dismissal of the appeal.

The reasons are now stated. The petition, as amended, alleged that the persons specified as nominees were nominated for the offices respectively of President, Vice President, presidential electors, and Congressmen from the several districts in Maryland, by a Union Political Party which had been duly incorporated under the laws of the state on August 24th, 1936. This new party, it was alleged, held a convention of delegates representing all the legislative districts in the state on September 30th, 1936, and in due form the convention made the nominations specified, and certified them to the Secretary of State charged with giving the nom nations effect, under and in accordance with sections 50 and 56 of article 33, but that the Secretary of State refused to receive the certificate. The petition for the writ of mandamus followed.

The Election Laws of the State, article 33, providethree methods of nomination by parties other than those which polled ten per cent, of the entire vote cast in the state at a preceding general election, for which the regular primary election is prescribed. Section 190. Primary elections are open to voters representing a particular party or principle whose highest candidate at any election within two years next preceding polled more than one per cent, and less than ten per cent, of the ent re vote cast in the state, county or other division or district for which the nomination is made. Section 49.

The Union Political Party, being new, could not come within that class, and, moreover, the time for holding a ^primary election had passed when the party was organized. Second, a convention may be held by an organization of voters coming within the description just given, section 49, and, of course, this new party could not, for the same reason, avail itself of that method. Third, under section 51, nominations could be made by certificates of nomination, signed by voters in specified numbers according to the extent of territory in which the vote for each office is taken, accompanied by