Maryland case law › King v. State

King v. State

434 Md. 472 (2013) · Court of Appeals of Maryland
Court of Appeals of Maryland✓ Good law

BELL, C.J., (ret.) dissenting. I dissent. It is my belief that the conclusion this Court reached applying the Fourth Amendment is equally supported by application of Article 26 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, which we determined, at that time, to be a moot argument. Accordingly, I would re-affirm our judgment on that State Law ground.