Hamilton v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
Henderson, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an application for leave to appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus by Judge Raine, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. Petitioner pleaded guilty to six charges of larceny of six different automobiles, and on February 6, 1956, was sentenced by Judge Carter, in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, to eight years in each case, to run concurrently. Petitioner was twenty-one years of age and had had a previous conviction in the Criminal Court.
At the time of his arraignment he did not ask for counsel and entered the pleas in person. But the court appointed counsel and postponed the case until later in the day. Petitioner admits that he told his court-appointed counsel he did not desire to change his pleas. He complains that his counsel was not prepared to properly represent him, and he did not realize that since three of the counts charged larceny of automobiles in Baltimore County the court lacked jurisdiction on these counts.
This phase of the case was discussed and disposed of on a previous application for leave to appeal from the denial of a writ, in Hamilton v. Warden, 212 Md. 659 , where it was pointed out that he would not be entitled to release in any event, since the sentences were concurrent. Petitioner now alleges for the first time that his pleas of guilty were induced by a promise that was not carried out by the arresting officers. He alleges that Lieutenant Martin-dale of the Baltimore Police Department told him that if he would cooperate in the recovery of the stolen cars from Virginia and North Carolina, and would plead guilty, Lieutenant Martindale would request the court to suspend sentence in order that the petitioner might be turned over to the Federal authorities for prosecution under the Dyer Act. Petitioner alleges that despite his “cooperation”, and pleas of guilty, no such recommendation was made to the court, and he had since been informed by the F. B. I. that he would not have received a
This is a preview of Hamilton v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction. About 50% of the opinion remains. Read the complete opinion in RecordCite.